Membership information
Conference and publication discouts. Learn more >>
Read Aries online
Donate online or obtain our bank account and PayPal details. More information >>
The esoteric "religious" powers of figurative sculpture appear most vividly in iconoclastic acts of destruction taken against them. Such acts reveal an ambivalence in iconoclasts’ relationships with these artworks, a simultaneous attraction to their nearhuman quality, which allows sculptures to serve as ritual substitutes for live persons, as scapegoats, and a repulsion to them that motivates the attack. Paradoxically, iconoclastic attacks help to produce artworks as sacred—as incarnational, presence-bearing forms. To show this, I consider the case of the 1970 bombing of Rodin’s “Thinker” in Cleveland as an act of ritual sacrifice; a sculpture “killed” as though it were a condemned person. Instead of destroying it, though, the iconoclasts animated it. The cast of the Cleveland Museum of Art’s Thinker now pulses with life in a way unlike any other version. Damaged by the blast, wrenched apart, its base a jagged plume, the Thinker’s ripped legs and hollowed torso open now to a distinct kind of nearhuman agency, as martyr.
Click here for banner image information.